For a long time a receptor was assumed to do one thing: bind a signal and pass it on. So when immunologists in the early 1990s found a second interleukin-1 receptor that bound IL-1 perfectly well yet stubbornly refused to signal, it looked like a broken receptor — a mistake. Why would a cell build a catching device with the wiring cut?
In 1993 a team led by Francesco Colotta and Alberto Mantovani realised the "fault" was the point. The receptor was not broken; it was a trap. It existed precisely to grab IL-1 and hold it away from the real, signalling receptor — a built-in brake on inflammation. They named it a decoy receptor2, and the phrase stuck, reframing a whole category of proteins that had been dismissed as non-functional.
That reframing — a receptor whose job is to catch and not respond — turned out to be one of biology's more quietly influential ideas. Within a decade the same logic had been engineered into a family of trap medicines, and a "broken" receptor had become the blueprint for a drug class.
Panacea Bio Chem · Receptor Biology Record

























